Run the legacy baseline and the modern upgrade on the same input data, then judge by honest cross-validated metrics — not screenshots.
MLP (legacy) vs Gradient Boosting (modern). Upload ONE Excel and both models train on it — fair side-by-side. Leave the file picker empty to use the bundled sample (48-row NSMLab dataset).
File upload is part of the personal cabinet. In demo mode the platform runs every program on bundled sample data — sign up free to upload your own Excel / .dat / model files and save the results.
Single 80/20 train/test split with data-augmented training. Metrics live inside the generated image (Actual vs Predicted scatter, MAE curve).
Legacy: Prasad on the sparse 4×4 grid, interpolated by cubic griddata. Modern: a PINN learns the flow-stress surface from the same 16 curves and derives a smooth 50×50 η/ξ field via autodiff. Upload one Excel and both run on it — otherwise the bundled AISI 4340 sample is used.
File upload is part of the personal cabinet. In demo mode the platform runs every program on bundled sample data — sign up free to upload your own Excel / .dat / model files and save the results.
Discrete (T, ε̇) values interpolated globally. Reasonable inside the 4×4 grid but extrapolation/contours can be noisy.
Live inference comparison requires a trained Attention U-Net .h5 (offline, GPU). Until that's available, the comparison below is an architecture & capability summary.